Decent Infrastructure in an Authoritarian World · Part III — What It Means

/ 07 /The Economics of Utility vs. Speculation

We’re making the case against speculative tokenisation as people who’ve gained and lost as a consequence of it, not as people who avoided it.

Before making this argument, we have to name the irony. We raised capital in 2018 by issuing a token that was listed on exchanges. The financial systems of the time gave projects like ours no clean alternative — if you needed capital to build, you issued a token, and tokens attract speculators no matter what the documentation said the token was for. What we were proposing — a mutual-credit currency rather than a tradable token — wasn’t something mainstream investors understood, notwithstanding that raising capital from traditional sources ran against the goals of almost every early-stage Web3 project of that era. And, candidly, we are people whose ongoing work that very speculation has helped fund. We saw it coming, and said so: the original Green Paper told participants, in plain terms, not to acquire the token “for speculative or investment purposes with the expectation of making an investment return.” They did anyway. The market does what the market does.

That’s not hypocrisy. It’s the point: the system selects for this outcome regardless of disclosure or intent. Which is precisely why the infrastructure we’ve built matters.

Most cryptocurrency tokens exist in a speculative demand cycle: people buy them because they expect others to buy them at higher prices later. Demand increases when price increases, collapses when price falls, and is structurally disconnected from whether the underlying project delivers anything useful. The Economist’s observation that crypto is “a speculative asset class with no fundamental value or income-generating potential” accurately describes this dynamic (see note 8). It’s not a criticism of decentralised systems as a concept. It’s a description of how most decentralised systems are built.

HoloFuel is different in kind because its demand derives from use, not speculation. Hosts earn HoloFuel providing compute and spend it acquiring services. Publishers buy hosting capacity. Projects that adopt HoloFuel as their native currency create communities that transact in it for real goods and services. This is demand rooted in economic activity that exists regardless of what speculators think HoloFuel is worth. The credit mechanism itself does not produce appreciation: when demand rises, credit limits expand and supply meets it, rather than units becoming scarcer. That is deliberate — stable value is what makes economic planning possible. This describes how the currency works internally. It is not a claim that no rate will ever exist between HoloFuel and anything else. HoloFuel is self-custodial, and what people agree between themselves is their own business.

That is what utility demand looks like. It’s the demand structure of useful infrastructure — and it’s what the speculative token model, almost without exception, was not.

HoloFuel is also a poor vehicle for speculation, by design. The mutual credit structure — net supply always zero, credit limits tied to productive output, value anchored to commodity compute costs — resists the price dynamics that make speculative tokens attractive to traders. The stability is the feature. Predictable value makes economic planning possible. Economic planning makes real businesses viable. Real businesses create durable demand.

Conventional token metrics — fixed supply, market capitalisation, circulating supply ratios — are artefacts of the speculative model. They don’t apply to a mutual credit currency whose supply expands and contracts with real economic activity and whose value was never fixed to a particular asset. Evaluating HoloFuel by those metrics is like valuing a current account by the logic of a commodity futures contract.

The network economics compound. Each additional token joining the Decent Market — should we move to launch — costs O(1) to add one oracle feed. But for everyone already in it, a new token adds one more exchange destination — so each arrival makes the network more valuable to all the rest as it grows. And liquidity concentrates rather than fragments: in a trading pair model, each new token draws liquidity away from existing pools; in a clearinghouse, all liquidity is available to all participants through the common settlement layer.

Every token market gets thinner as it scales. Ours gets deeper.

We don’t sell HoloFuel. You earn it by providing value to the network, or spend it to receive value back — the way any mutual credit currency works. For those who haven’t earned it, there is one route in, and only one: migrating HOT.